askill
ipps-deep-research

ipps-deep-researchSafety 90Repository

Apply when conducting deep research on technologies, APIs, frameworks, or other software development topics requiring systematic investigation

2 stars
1.2k downloads
Updated 2/2/2026

Package Files

Loading files...
SKILL.md

Deep Research Skill

Systematic research patterns for in-depth investigation of software development topics.

Table of Contents

Core

Patterns

Strategies

Planning & Tracking

Reference

When to Use

Deep research (this skill):

  • "Should we use X or Y for our project?"
  • "How does X work internally?"
  • "What are the production considerations for X?"
  • Multi-source synthesis required
  • Exhaustive documentation needed

Quick lookup (not this skill):

  • "What's the syntax for X?"
  • "How do I install Y?"
  • Single-source answers

MUST-NOT-FORGET

  • Start with assumptions check - write down what you think you know before researching
  • Primary sources > secondary sources > community opinions
  • Document all sources with URLs and access dates
  • Flag information age (APIs change rapidly)
  • Distinguish facts from opinions from assumptions
  • Version-match community sources to subject version
  • Create INFO document for findings
  • Always create STRUT for research session orchestration
  • Track time - log task start/end for net research time calculation
  • Track credits - detect model via screenshot, log switches, calculate usage
  • Never auto-switch models - respect user's model selection throughout research

Global Patterns

MEPI vs MCPI

MEPI (Most Executable Point of Information) - Default

  • Present 2-3 curated options
  • Filter and recommend
  • Use for: reversible decisions, time-constrained, action-oriented

MCPI (Most Complete Point of Information) - Exception

  • Present exhaustive options
  • Document everything
  • Use for: irreversible decisions, high-stakes, archival reference

Source Hierarchy

  1. Official PDFs/papers - Legislation, specs, whitepapers, academic papers (often not available as web)
  2. Official documentation - Authoritative, version-specific
  3. Official blog/changelog - Announcements, rationale
  4. GitHub repo - Source code, issues, PRs, discussions
  5. Conference talks by maintainers - Design decisions, roadmap
  6. Reputable tech blogs - Analysis, comparisons
  7. Stack Overflow - Specific problems (verify currency)
  8. Community forums/Discord - Anecdotes, edge cases

Source Persistence: Download and store all sources in session folder for later reference. Web content changes - PDFs and local copies ensure reproducibility.

Verification Labels

  • [VERIFIED] - Confirmed from official documentation
  • [ASSUMED] - Inferred but not explicitly stated
  • [TESTED] - Manually tested by running code
  • [PROVEN] - Confirmed from multiple independent sources
  • [COMMUNITY] - Reported by community sources (cite source ID)

Source ID Format

[TOPIC]-IN01-SC-[SOURCE]-[DOCNAME]

Examples:

  • GRPH-IN01-SC-MSFT-APIOVERVIEW - Microsoft Graph official docs
  • GRPH-IN01-SC-SO-RATELIMIT - Stack Overflow rate limit discussion
  • GRPH-IN01-SC-GH-ISSUE1234 - GitHub issue #1234

File Naming Conventions

  • __ prefix (double underscore): Master/index documents (SOURCES, TOC, TEMPLATE)
  • _ prefix (single underscore): Topic content files (INFO documents)
  • No prefix: Tracking files (TASKS, NOTES, PROBLEMS, PROGRESS)

Information Currency

  • Note version numbers for all API/library info
  • Check last updated date on documentation
  • Cross-reference with changelog for breaking changes
  • Mark stale info with [STALE: YYYY] tag

Research Strategies

Available research strategies (each has its own file):

Quick research (MEPI-style) until full strategy implemented: For reversible/low-stakes decisions, use abbreviated approach:

  1. Phase 1 (Preflight): 5-10 sources max, skip community deep-dive
  2. Skip Phases 2-4 (no TOC, template, or TASKS)
  3. Phase 5: Create single _INFO_[TOPIC].md with findings
  4. Phase 6: Quick /verify, done

Future strategies (not yet implemented):

  • Technology Research (MEPI) - Quick technology evaluation
  • Decision Research - Choose between options
  • Problem-Solving Research - Debug and fix issues

Tool Reference

See RESEARCH_TOOLS.md for:

  • Source collection tools (search_web, read_url_content, Playwright)
  • Document processing tools (pdf-tools)
  • Transcription tools (llm-transcription)
  • Tool selection flowchart
  • Common workflows

Planning Structure

STRUT (high-level orchestration) - REQUIRED for all research:

  • Tracks phases, objectives, deliverables, transitions
  • Contains time log for net research time
  • Created at research start, updated at phase transitions
  • File: STRUT_[TOPIC].md in session folder

TASKS (low-level execution) - Created in Phase 4:

  • Flat list of individual research tasks with durations
  • Each task: file to create, sources to use, done-when criteria
  • Tracks task timing: [HH:MM-HH:MM] per task
  • File: TASKS.md in session folder

Time Tracking

Net research time = active work time, excluding pauses.

STRUT time log format:

## Time Log
Started: 2026-01-30 09:00
Ended: 2026-01-30 14:30

Active intervals:
- 09:00-10:30 (Phase 1-3)
- 11:00-12:15 (Phase 4-5)
- 13:00-14:30 (Phase 5-6)

Net research time: 4h 15m

TASKS timing format:

- [x] TK-01: Research auth [10:00-10:45] 45m
- [x] TK-02: Research limits [10:15-11:00] 45m (parallel)

Rules:

  • Pause detection: Gap > 30min in file timestamps = pause (don't count)
  • Parallel tasks: Overlapping intervals count once, not doubled
  • Log start time when beginning task, end time when completing

Credit Tracking (Mandatory)

Workflow:

  1. At phase start: simple-screenshot.ps1 → detect model from Windsurf header
  2. Lookup cost in windsurf-model-registry.json
  3. Log model + timestamp in STRUT Credit Tracking section
  4. At session end: calculate total estimated credits

STRUT Credit Tracking format:

## Credit Tracking
Phase 1: Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking) [5x] - 09:00
Phase 2: Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking) [5x] - 09:30
Phase 4: Claude Sonnet 4.5 [2x] - 10:15 (user switched)
Phase 5: Claude Sonnet 4.5 [2x] - 10:45
Phase 6: Claude Sonnet 4.5 [2x] - 11:30

Estimated credits: (2 phases × 5x) + (3 phases × 2x) = 16 units

Rules:

  • Never auto-switch models - respect user's model selection
  • Detect via screenshot only - passive observation
  • Log when model changes (user-initiated)
  • Registry: [DEVSYSTEM_FOLDER]/skills/windsurf-auto-model-switcher/windsurf-model-registry.json

Output Format

Deep research outputs an INFO document. Key sections:

  1. Research Question - What we're investigating
  2. Key Findings - MEPI-style summary (2-3 main points) or MCPI exhaustive list
  3. Detailed Analysis - Full investigation results
  4. Limitations and Known Issues - From community sources
  5. Sources - All references with quality indicators
  6. Recommendations - Actionable conclusions

Usage

  1. Determine research type (MEPI quick vs MCPI exhaustive)
  2. Read this SKILL.md for core principles
  3. Read the appropriate strategy file
  4. Read RESEARCH_TOOLS.md for tool guidance
  5. Follow the strategy's phases systematically
  6. Output findings as INFO document

Install

Download ZIP
Requires askill CLI v1.0+

AI Quality Score

90/100Analyzed 2/10/2026

A professional-grade research framework that defines systematic investigation patterns, source hierarchies, and rigorous documentation standards for software development topics.

90
95
85
95
92

Metadata

Licenseunknown
Version-
Updated2/2/2026
Publisherkarstenheld3

Tags

apigithubgithub-actionsllmsecurity