askill
work-type-classifier

work-type-classifierSafety 95Repository

This skill should be used when the user initiates autonomous development with /auto, /auto-lite, or similar commands to classify the type of work. Semantic work type classification with multi-layer detection. Analyzes user request using keywords, intent, output type, and confidence scoring. Automatically triggers ASK_USER if confidence is below threshold. Outputs skill activation plan to .claude/auto-context.yaml.

0 stars
1.2k downloads
Updated 1/27/2026

Package Files

Loading files...
SKILL.md

Work Type Classifier v3.0

Multi-layer semantic classification for autonomous development requests.

Classification Architecture

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  SEMANTIC CLASSIFIER v3.0                                       │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  Layer 1: Keyword Detection (base score)                        │
│  Layer 2: Intent Analysis (modifier)                            │
│  Layer 3: Output Type Detection (modifier)                      │
│  Layer 4: Confidence Calculation + User Fallback                │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Layer 1: Keyword Detection

Scan for explicit work type indicators:

FRONTEND Keywords (score: +1 each)

English: "UI", "component", "page", "design", "frontend", "React", "Vue",
         "CSS", "Tailwind", "button", "form", "modal", "layout", "style",
         "responsive", "mobile", "animation", "theme", "dark mode", "UX"

Croatian: "dizajn", "komponenta", "stranica", "sučelje", "gumb", "obrazac",
          "izgled", "tema", "animacija", "responzivan"

Frameworks: "Next.js", "Nuxt", "Svelte", "Astro", "Remix", "Vite"

BACKEND Keywords (score: +1 each)

English: "API", "endpoint", "backend", "database", "server", "REST",
         "GraphQL", "authentication", "middleware", "microservice",
         "queue", "worker", "cron", "webhook", "migration"

Croatian: "baza podataka", "autentikacija", "server", "pozadina"

Frameworks: "Express", "FastAPI", "Django", "Rails", "Nest.js"

RESEARCH Keywords (score: +1 each)

English: "audit", "analyze", "review", "explore", "investigate", "check",
         "find", "search", "assess", "evaluate", "security", "performance",
         "vulnerability", "bottleneck", "report"

Croatian: "provjeri", "analiziraj", "istraži", "pregledaj", "sigurnost",
          "audit", "ranjivost", "procijeni"

DOCUMENTATION Keywords (score: +1 each)

English: "docs", "documentation", "README", "spec", "proposal", "guide"
Croatian: "dokumentacija", "upute", "specifikacija"

CREATIVE Keywords (score: +1 each)

English: "art", "visual", "poster", "GIF", "animation", "graphic", "logo"
Croatian: "umjetnost", "vizualno", "plakat", "grafika"

Layer 2: Intent Analysis

Detect user's underlying intent beyond explicit keywords:

DESIGN_QUALITY Intent

Triggers: "beautiful", "stunning", "impressive", "wow", "amazing",
          "perfect", "professional", "polished", "elegant"
Croatian:  "lijep", "impresivan", "savršen", "profesionalan", "ocarati",
           "oduševiti", "elegantan", "moderan"

Effect: If FRONTEND detected, adds DESIGN_QUALITY focus
        → Forces frontend-design skill invocation

SECURITY Intent

Triggers: "secure", "safe", "vulnerability", "attack", "hack", "protect",
          "OWASP", "injection", "XSS", "CSRF"
Croatian:  "siguran", "zaštita", "napad", "ranjivost"

Effect: Adds SECURITY focus to any work type
        → Forces security-focused code review

PERFORMANCE Intent

Triggers: "fast", "quick", "optimize", "speed", "slow", "performance",
          "efficient", "bottleneck", "scale"
Croatian:  "brzo", "optimiziraj", "sporo", "performanse", "efikasno"

Effect: Adds PERFORMANCE focus
        → Forces performance analysis patterns

MULTIPLE_OUTPUTS Intent

Triggers: Numbers + nouns: "5 pages", "3 components", "several", "multiple"
Croatian:  "5 stranica", "3 komponente", "nekoliko", "više"

Effect: Indicates multiple deliverables expected
        → Adjusts planning for parallel work

Layer 3: Output Type Detection

Determine what the user expects as output:

IMPLEMENTATION Output

Triggers: "build", "create", "implement", "add", "make", "develop", "code"
Croatian:  "napravi", "izradi", "implementiraj", "dodaj", "razvij"

Result: Standard implementation workflow (7 phases)

RESEARCH Output

Triggers: "audit", "analyze", "review", "report", "findings", "assess"
Croatian:  "auditiraj", "analiziraj", "pregled", "izvještaj", "procjena"

Result: Research workflow (R1-R4)
        → Switches to /auto-audit flow

DOCUMENTATION Output

Triggers: "document", "write docs", "explain", "describe"
Croatian:  "dokumentiraj", "objasni", "opiši"

Result: Documentation workflow

Layer 4: Confidence Calculation

Scoring Formula

base_score = sum(keyword_matches) * keyword_weight
intent_modifier = sum(intent_matches) * intent_weight
output_modifier = output_type_match * output_weight

total_score = base_score + intent_modifier + output_modifier

confidence = total_score / max_possible_score

Weights

keyword_weight: 1.0
intent_weight: 0.5
output_weight: 0.3

Thresholds

confident: >= 0.70      # Proceed without asking
uncertain: 0.40 - 0.69  # ASK USER to confirm
ambiguous: < 0.40       # ASK USER to specify

Tie-Breaking Rules

When multiple work types score equally:

  1. If RESEARCH keywords present → RESEARCH wins
  2. If FRONTEND + BACKEND equal → FULLSTACK
  3. If still tied → ASK USER

Classification Process

Step 1: Run All Layers

# Pseudocode
keywords = detect_keywords(request)
intents = analyze_intent(request)
output_type = detect_output_type(request)

scores = calculate_scores(keywords, intents, output_type)
work_type = get_highest_score(scores)
confidence = calculate_confidence(scores)

Step 2: Check Confidence

if confidence >= 0.70:
    proceed_with_classification(work_type)
elif confidence >= 0.40:
    ask_user_to_confirm(work_type, confidence)
else:
    ask_user_to_specify()

Step 3: User Confirmation (if needed)

When confidence < 0.70, use AskUserQuestion:

Detektiram [WORK_TYPE] task s [FOCUS] fokusom (confidence: [X]%).

Jesi li to točno?
- Da, nastavi
- Ne, ovo je [alternativa]
- Promijeni na: [custom]

Step 4: Output Classification

Create .claude/auto-context.yaml:

# Auto-generated by work-type-classifier v3.0
# Generated: <timestamp>

classification:
  work_type: FRONTEND | BACKEND | FULLSTACK | RESEARCH | DOCUMENTATION | CREATIVE
  confidence: 0.85
  user_confirmed: false | true

  # Layer 1 results
  detected_keywords:
    - "dizajn"
    - "prototip"
    - "UI"

  # Layer 2 results
  detected_intents:
    - DESIGN_QUALITY

  # Layer 3 results
  output_type: IMPLEMENTATION | RESEARCH | DOCUMENTATION

focus:
  - DESIGN_QUALITY   # If detected
  - SECURITY         # If detected
  - PERFORMANCE      # If detected
  - MULTIPLE_OUTPUTS # If detected

# Skill activation based on classification
skills_to_invoke:
  # Always invoked
  discipline:
    - superpowers:brainstorming
    - superpowers:writing-plans
    - superpowers:test-driven-development
    - superpowers:verification-before-completion
    - superpowers:requesting-code-review

  # Based on work_type
  domain_specific:
    - <skill-1>
    - <skill-2>

  # If focus detected
  focus_skills:
    - <focus-skill-1>

# Phase-specific instructions
phase_instructions:
  phase_2:
    - "MANDATORY: Invoke skills from domain_specific list"
  phase_4:
    - "MANDATORY: Apply TDD"
    - "MANDATORY: Apply domain_specific skills during implementation"
  phase_6:
    - "MANDATORY: Run fresh verification"

Skill Mapping by Work Type

FRONTEND

domain_specific:
  - frontend-design      # ALWAYS for FRONTEND
  - webapp-testing       # E2E testing
focus_skills:
  DESIGN_QUALITY:
    - frontend-design    # Double emphasis

BACKEND

domain_specific:
  - architecture-patterns
  - api-design-principles
focus_skills:
  SECURITY:
    - code-reviewer (security mode)

FULLSTACK

domain_specific:
  - frontend-design
  - architecture-patterns

RESEARCH

domain_specific: []      # No implementation skills
workflow: "research"     # Use R1-R4 workflow
output: "docs/audits/"

DOCUMENTATION

domain_specific:
  - doc-coauthoring

CREATIVE

domain_specific:
  - canvas-design
  - algorithmic-art

Integration with State Machine

After classification, update state machine:

# scripts/state-transition.sh
state-transition.sh work-type "$WORK_TYPE" "$FOCUS" "$CONFIDENCE"

This ensures mandatory skills are enforced by the pre-phase hook.

Examples

Example 1: Croatian Frontend Request

Input: "ajde napravi 5 savršenih prototipova dizajna koji ce ocarati usere"

Layer 1 (Keywords):
  - "dizajna" → FRONTEND (+1)
  - "prototipova" → FRONTEND (+1)

Layer 2 (Intent):
  - "savršenih" → DESIGN_QUALITY
  - "ocarati" → DESIGN_QUALITY

Layer 3 (Output):
  - "napravi" → IMPLEMENTATION
  - "5" → MULTIPLE_OUTPUTS

Result:
  work_type: FRONTEND
  confidence: 0.85
  focus: [DESIGN_QUALITY, MULTIPLE_OUTPUTS]
  mandatory_skills: [frontend-design, webapp-testing]

Example 2: Security Audit Request

Input: "audit auth feature and tell me if everything is secure"

Layer 1 (Keywords):
  - "audit" → RESEARCH (+1)
  - "auth" → BACKEND (+1)

Layer 2 (Intent):
  - "secure" → SECURITY

Layer 3 (Output):
  - "audit" → RESEARCH output
  - "tell me" → REPORT expected

Result:
  work_type: RESEARCH
  confidence: 0.90
  focus: [SECURITY]
  workflow: research (R1-R4)
  output: docs/audits/

Example 3: Ambiguous Request

Input: "make the app better"

Layer 1 (Keywords):
  - "app" → FULLSTACK (+0.5)

Layer 2 (Intent):
  - "better" → (ambiguous)

Layer 3 (Output):
  - "make" → IMPLEMENTATION

Result:
  work_type: FULLSTACK
  confidence: 0.35
  ACTION: ASK_USER

Question: "Što točno želiš poboljšati?
- Frontend/UI dizajn
- Backend/API performanse
- Oboje
- Nešto drugo"

Quality Standards

  1. ALWAYS create .claude/auto-context.yaml before Phase 2
  2. NEVER proceed with confidence < 0.40 without user input
  3. ALWAYS include detected keywords and intents for transparency
  4. ALWAYS update state machine with work_type and confidence
  5. PRIORITIZE RESEARCH detection - audits should not run implementation workflow

When NOT to Use This Skill

Do NOT use this skill when:

  1. User explicitly specifies work type - Trust user's classification
  2. Resuming from checkpoint - Use saved classification
  3. Sequential simple commands - Direct requests like "run tests"
  4. Non-development tasks - Questions, explanations, general queries
  5. Already classified - Check .claude/auto-context.yaml first

Install

Download ZIP
Requires askill CLI v1.0+

AI Quality Score

82/100Analyzed 2/18/2026

Highly detailed and well-structured skill for classifying autonomous development work types with multi-layer semantic analysis. Comprehensive keyword detection, confidence scoring, and skill mapping. Slightly penalized for internal-only signals (project-specific paths, skills, state machine) but still demonstrates strong technical architecture that could be adapted. Excellent actionability with specific formulas, thresholds, and examples in multiple languages.

95
95
60
95
90

Metadata

Licenseunknown
Version-
Updated1/27/2026
Publisheradiomas

Tags

apici-cddatabasegithub-actionsgraphqlllmsecuritytesting