askill
brainstorming

brainstormingSafety 92Repository

Explores requirements, searches past decisions, creates design documents, and sets up feature branches. Use before any feature work or when starting a new feature.

4 stars
1.2k downloads
Updated 2/15/2026

Package Files

Loading files...
SKILL.md

Brainstorming

Turn ideas into designs through collaborative dialogue.

Announce: "I'm using the brainstorming skill to explore this feature."

The Flow

EC Search → Branch Setup → Q&A → Approaches → Design → Save

Step 1: Search Memory

Before designing, check what we've done before:

ec_search:
  query: [feature area]
  type: decision

ec_search:
  query: [related patterns]
  type: pattern

ec_search:
  query: [similar features]

Note relevant past decisions that might inform or constrain the design.

Step 2: Branch Setup

Check current state:

git branch --show-current
git status

Load branch convention from config:

ec_search:
  query: project config
  type: config

REQUIRED: Use the AskUserQuestion tool to determine branching:

If on main:

{
  "questions": [{
    "question": "Create a feature branch for this work?",
    "header": "Branch",
    "options": [
      { "label": "Yes", "description": "Create {convention}/<name> branch" },
      { "label": "No", "description": "Stay on main" }
    ],
    "multiSelect": false
  }]
}

If on feature branch:

{
  "questions": [{
    "question": "Where should this new work branch from?",
    "header": "Branch",
    "options": [
      { "label": "Current branch", "description": "Nested feature off current work" },
      { "label": "Main", "description": "Fresh start from main" }
    ],
    "multiSelect": false
  }]
}

This enables branching cycles - features can spawn sub-features.

Step 3: Understand the Idea

REQUIRED: Use the AskUserQuestion tool for all clarifying questions.

  • 1-4 questions per tool call
  • 2-4 options per question
  • Users can always type free text (implicit "Other" option)
  • Use multiSelect: true when multiple options can apply

Focus on:

  • What problem are we solving?
  • What are the constraints?
  • What does success look like?

Example:

{
  "questions": [{
    "question": "Who should have access to this feature?",
    "header": "Access",
    "options": [
      { "label": "All users", "description": "Any authenticated user" },
      { "label": "Admins only", "description": "Requires admin role" },
      { "label": "Role-based", "description": "Configurable per role" }
    ],
    "multiSelect": false
  }]
}

Step 4: Explore Approaches

Propose 2-3 approaches with trade-offs. Lead with your recommendation and why.

Search EC for relevant prior decisions:

ec_search:
  query: [technology or pattern being considered]
  type: decision

Keep it conversational:

"I'd go with Option A because [reason]. Option B would work if [condition]. Option C is overkill unless [edge case]."

Step 5: Present Design

Once you understand what we're building, present the design in chunks (200-300 words each). Check after each section if it looks right.

Cover:

  • Architecture / component structure
  • Data flow
  • Key implementation details
  • Edge cases / error handling

Be ready to backtrack if something doesn't fit.

Step 6: Save Design

Write to docs/designs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md

Include:

  • Summary of what we're building
  • Key decisions and rationale
  • Reference to any EC memories consulted
  • Placeholder for implementation plan: See: docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md

Step 7: Store Decisions

For each significant architectural decision made:

ec_add:
  type: decision
  area: [component]
  content: [What was decided and why]
  rationale: [Trade-offs considered]

Handoff

After saving:

"Design saved to docs/designs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md. Ready to create the implementation plan?"

If yes → Use @writing-plans (all tasks will follow @tdd red-green-refactor)

Install

Download ZIP
Requires askill CLI v1.0+

AI Quality Score

78/100Analyzed 2/23/2026

Well-structured brainstorming skill with clear 7-step workflow and excellent actionability. Provides concrete examples, JSON templates, and command snippets. Somewhat project-specific (references EC memory system, project conventions), reducing general reusability. Good clarity and safety, but completeness could be improved with more edge case handling. Score reflects solid technical quality offset by moderate internal-only characteristics.

92
88
58
80
88

Metadata

Licenseunknown
Version-
Updated2/15/2026
PublisherMereWhiplash

Tags

No tags yet.