askill
code-review-checklist

code-review-checklistSafety 95Repository

Structured checklist for code review: bugs, style, performance, security, docs.

3 stars
1.2k downloads
Updated 3/8/2026

Package Files

Loading files...
SKILL.md

Code Review Checklist

1. Task Compliance

  • Requirements: Fulfills all "Changes Description" items?
  • Acceptance Criteria: Met?
  • Use Cases: Main scenario works?

2. Implementation Quality

  • Top-Down/Stubs:
    • Stub Task: Returns hardcoded values? NO logic? E2E checks hardcode?
    • Impl Task: Real logic replaces stub? E2E updated?
  • No Duplication: used existing methods/helpers?
  • Error Handling: Exceptions caught and logged?
  • Code Smells: No magic numbers, understandable names?

3. Documentation "First"

  • Directory Docs: .AGENTS.md updated for touched source directories under memory tracking policy (or bootstrap step recorded)?
  • Docstrings: Present for new classes/methods? (Google/JSDoc)
  • Project Docs: README updated if architecture changed?

4. Testing

  • E2E: Passed? Checks main scenario?
  • Regression: All passed?
  • Unit: Edge cases covered?
  • No Mocking: Real LLM/DB used in integration tests?

5. Consistency

  • Backward Compatibility: Existing consumers not broken?
  • Architecture: Follows layers (Service -> Repo)?
  • Style: Matches project conventions?

6. High Assurance (If Tier 3 Active)

  • Fail Reason Verified? Did the tests fail exactly as predicted?
  • Pass Reason Rational? Does EXPLAIN_PASS_REASON match the code?
  • Law of Minimalism: No dead code? No speculation?
  • Mutation Check: If you delete a line, does it fail?

Criticality Protocol

  • πŸ”΄ BLOCKING: Task not done, Test failure, Broken compat, Stub violation (Logic in stub task).
  • 🟑 MAJOR: Documentation missing, Duplication, Poor names.
  • 🟒 MINOR: Style nits.

Install

Download ZIP
Requires askill CLI v1.0+β–Ά

AI Quality Score

73/100Analyzed 3/15/2026

Solid code review checklist with comprehensive coverage of review areas and clear organizational structure. Provides good reference material for code reviewers but lacks explicit usage instructions and contains some project-specific references. The checklist format is actionable but would benefit from step-by-step guidance. Well-suited as an internal review guide within this project's agent workflow.

95
85
65
75
55

Metadata

Licenseunknown
Version-
Updated3/8/2026
PublisherMatrixFounder

Tags

llmtesting