askill
doc-coauthoring

doc-coauthoringSafety 90Repository

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

16 stars
1.2k downloads
Updated 3/6/2026

Package Files

Loading files...
SKILL.md

Doc Co-Authoring Workflow

This skill provides a structured workflow for guiding users through collaborative document creation. Act as an active guide, walking users through three stages: Context Gathering, Refinement & Structure, and Reader Testing.

When to Offer This Workflow

Trigger conditions:

  • User mentions writing documentation: "write a doc", "draft a proposal", "create a spec", "write up"
  • User mentions specific doc types: "PRD", "design doc", "decision doc", "RFC"
  • User seems to be starting a substantial writing task

Initial offer: Offer the user a structured workflow for co-authoring the document. Explain the three stages:

  1. Context Gathering: User provides all relevant context while Claude asks clarifying questions
  2. Refinement & Structure: Iteratively build each section through brainstorming and editing
  3. Reader Testing: Test the doc with a fresh Claude (no context) to catch blind spots before others read it

Explain that this approach helps ensure the doc works well when others read it (including when they paste it into Claude). Ask if they want to try this workflow or prefer to work freeform.

If user declines, work freeform. If user accepts, proceed to Stage 1.

Stage 1: Context Gathering

Goal: Close the gap between what the user knows and what Claude knows, enabling smart guidance later.

Initial Questions

Start by asking the user for meta-context about the document:

  1. What type of document is this? (e.g., technical spec, decision doc, proposal)
  2. Who's the primary audience?
  3. What's the desired impact when someone reads this?
  4. Is there a template or specific format to follow?
  5. Any other constraints or context to know?

Inform them they can answer in shorthand or dump information however works best for them.

If user provides a template or mentions a doc type:

  • Ask if they have a template document to share
  • If they provide a link to a shared document, use the appropriate integration to fetch it
  • If they provide a file, read it

If user mentions editing an existing shared document:

  • Use the appropriate integration to read the current state
  • Check for images without alt-text
  • If images exist without alt-text, explain that when others use Claude to understand the doc, Claude won't be able to see them. Ask if they want alt-text generated. If so, request they paste each image into chat for descriptive alt-text generation.

Info Dumping

Once initial questions are answered, encourage the user to dump all the context they have. Request information such as:

  • Background on the project/problem
  • Related team discussions or shared documents
  • Why alternative solutions aren't being used
  • Organizational context (team dynamics, past incidents, politics)

For detailed workflow steps and templates, see reference.md.

Install

Download ZIP
Requires askill CLI v1.0+

AI Quality Score

58/100Analyzed 3/9/2026

A documentation co-authoring workflow skill with a well-structured 3-stage approach. Stage 1 (Context Gathering) is detailed with specific questions to ask users. However, the skill is incomplete - Stages 2 and 3 are only mentioned by name, and it references an external reference.md file that isn't provided. Tags are mismatched (ci-cd, github-actions, etc. for a doc workflow). The core workflow is sound but needs completion of all stages to be fully actionable.

90
75
70
50
55

Metadata

Licenseunknown
Version-
Updated3/6/2026
PublisherKaimingWan

Tags

ci-cdgithub-actionsllmtesting